To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
That is one of the main reasons why POWER7 has been released such a short time after POWER6+. From the wikipedia article:
IBM basically won $244 million from DARPA to help develop the architecture.
... and unless they win another big DARPA or DoE contract, chances are that POWER7 is the end of the line for IBM's PPC, at least as far as the high performance non-embedded space is concerned.
The cost of developing the architecture and keep up with their fabbing is too much for the relative small market for such systems, without having a larger market to subsidize the development like intel has, for example.
Last I heard, the only reason why IBM is still in the HW business is due to the services revenue it generates, once the bean counters in IBM decide the investment is not worth the return they'll ax a lot of the cool tech that was applied from the PPC into the Z,P,I-series...and the associated ZOS, AIX and OS400 software stacks.





Member since:
2007-02-17
The machines reportedly run AIX or Linux.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/188790/ibm_launches_eightcore_power7...
...
The company also launched four Power7-based servers. IBM Power 780 and Power 770 high-end servers are based on modular designs and come with up to 64 Power7 cores. The IBM Power 755 will support up to 32 Power7 cores.
High-end stuff. If you were to cobble together a small cluster of such machines, I would imagine you would fairly quickly arrive in supercomputer territory without necessarily attracting a massive power bill.
Edited 2010-02-09 05:48 UTC