Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 10th Feb 2010 16:58 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 408723
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Safari is not the only one...
by PresentIt on Wed 10th Feb 2010 22:43
in reply to "RE[6]: Safari is not the only one..."
RE[8]: Safari is not the only one...
by nt_jerkface on Thu 11th Feb 2010 03:39
in reply to "RE[7]: Safari is not the only one..."
Who knows why, and who cares since it is their system. For all we know they may have mobile Safari heavily sandboxed and don't want to grant higher execution level to an application that isn't theirs. It's their phone, they can do what they want.
Opera's CEO is free to partner with a cell manufacturer and create his own phone. The iphone isn't a community device.





Member since:
2009-08-26
Allowing users to execute unchecked code is a security compromise, regardless of the system.
http://blog.intego.com/2009/01/22/mac-trojan-horse-osxtrojaniservic...