Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 26th Feb 2010 23:57 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 411285
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: R.I.P. Windows 2000 Professional
by MadRat on Sun 28th Feb 2010 02:29
in reply to "RE: R.I.P. Windows 2000 Professional"
I still wouldn't mind they take a page from the Win98SE experience, update it with a true x86-64 O/S core and hidden XP Home style of permissions (only accessed through safe mode or CLI) for a single user O/S-type of experience. A root password for administration and a separate log on password for the user - even if its limited to one user per system - is not a bad scheme to follow!
The whole Windows system folder layout made sense in Win98. Today's implementation doesn't improve on it by having so many layers - scattered layers at that - of folder/file locations for data, settings, and temp space.
Edited 2010-02-28 02:31 UTC




Member since:
2009-12-02
Same here. I love Windows 7, but 2000 will always hold a place in my heart (and mind).
In fact, Window 2000 with a decent firewall and protection (AVG and Spybot) plus a modern browser (Firefox 3.6) rocks socks for work purposes.