Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 26th Feb 2010 13:12 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Thread beginning with comment 411390
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Need Dirac and VP8 to.
by lemur2 on Sun 28th Feb 2010 23:49
in reply to "RE: Need Dirac and VP8 to."
Agreed. Talking about Theora and H.264 would be fine except that many people believe VP8 will be the 800lb gorilla if Google make it available to use on favourable terms.
If we are talking about the future, the current development branch of Theora is called Ptalarbvorm (the previous development version which has now become Theora 1.1 the codename was Thusnelda). Weird names, I agree.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theora
Like Thusnelda before it, Ptalarbvorm is optimisation of the Theora encoder only. Current Theora 1.1 players, such as the one embedded in Firefox 3.6, can play Ptalarbvorm-encoded Theora videos.
Anyway, the current experimental version of Ptalarbvorm is very promising, and initial results are finally getting better performance for Theora than h264 as currently used on the web. Theora Ptalarbvorm (experimental) at 376 kbit/s is approximately the same subjective quality as Youtube's current h264 implementation at 499 kbit/s.
If we are talking about the future, it may well not be either h264 or VP8 that yeilds the best performance for web video. It could well be the next version of the free and open Theora, already playable by current player software, that beats all comers.
Edited 2010-02-28 23:50 UTC
RE[3]: Need Dirac and VP8 to.
by darknexus on Mon 1st Mar 2010 10:30
in reply to "RE[2]: Need Dirac and VP8 to."





Member since:
2006-01-10
Agreed. Talking about Theora and H.264 would be fine except that many people believe VP8 will be the 800lb gorilla if Google make it available to use on favourable terms.