Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 26th Feb 2010 23:57 UTC

Thread beginning with comment 411462
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Windows 2000 had less service to manage, less open port. Security made more sense.
What are you talking about? Fewer open ports? It didn't even come with a firewall. A default Server 2008 install has a far smaller attack surface. You can break it down even farther with a core install.
Is there some luddite attachment to Win2k that I am missing?
Member since:
2006-03-20
I loved windows 2000
not for its aestethic, but about how windows 2000 seem better intgrated overall ( even if it still had some NT4 / NT3.51 /windows 3.1 style dialog ), overall it really seemed more polished than the more modern OS.
Windows 2000 had less service to manage, less open port. Security made more sense.
Unfortunately it was not designed with multimedia abilities in mind.
However it remains for me one of the best OS sold by microsoft so far.