To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
My problem is that they don't contribute to solve the problem by supporting the initiatives already in place.
We already have OpenID and OAuth for open and cross-"network" identification and authentication. Instead of writing *yet another* authentication and identification framework, why not contribute to and/or use those instead?
They're solving a problem that doesn't exist.
By your comment I'm guessing that you either haven't read what it does or managed to miss the point.
'It was put together by respected cryptography researcher Dr Stefan Brands. He created a company to develop and market U-Prove, Credentica, which was bought by Microsoft in March 2008. With U-Prove, identity information can be used securely, and private data can be safely shared to those parties that need it, without leaking more information than is required.'
'U-Prove allows the creation of secure ID tokens, which are pieces of data that incorporate whatever information I need for a given task—but no more—along with cryptographic protection to ensure that they can't be forged, reused, traced back to me, or linked to other tokens that I have issued.'
Because they are not Communists? Competition is good. We have single place where to buy alcohol(over 5%) but that hasn't stop alcoholism and all the other problems, instead it has created new problem called monopoly.





Member since:
2005-10-02
Ehh.. this one is very much open source. The BSD-license used is perfectly compatible with GPL. So what's your problem, apart from this coming from Microsoft?