Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 3rd Mar 2010 23:25 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Microsoft "Ultimately, we want to be able to securely make transactions without giving third parties the ability to masquerade as us; we want to be able to visit websites and make purchases without those sites being able to track us or combine different pieces of information to draw a more complete picture of us; we want to be able to be able to disclose some information about ourselves, but not everything. The U-Prove framework, released as a CTP today by Microsoft, aims to solve these problems."
Thread beginning with comment 412174
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Fail
by Karitku on Thu 4th Mar 2010 09:12 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Fail"
Member since:

My problem is that they don't contribute to solve the problem by supporting the initiatives already in place. We already have OpenID and OAuth for open and cross-"network" identification and authentication. Instead of writing *yet another* authentication and identification framework, why not contribute to and/or use those instead? They're solving a problem that doesn't exist.

Because they are not Communists? Competition is good. We have single place where to buy alcohol(over 5%) but that hasn't stop alcoholism and all the other problems, instead it has created new problem called monopoly.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: Fail
by zegenie on Thu 4th Mar 2010 09:44 in reply to "RE[3]: Fail"
zegenie Member since:

Yes, because they're not communists. That's what I said.

Reply Parent Score: 0