Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 9th Mar 2010 16:58 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 412947
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Three strikes in the USA?
by Carewolf on Wed 10th Mar 2010 08:43
in reply to "RE[6]: Three strikes in the USA?"
Europe does have HUGE armies, our totalled armed forces are similar in size to the US. We just spend 4 times less on it than the US (measure in percent of GDP). Remember it is not man-power that is expensive, the US is buying the latest and greatest and paying a huge premium for it. Think of it like this: The us buys the fastest 5GHz CPUs while Europe buys last years 4GHz CPUs four times cheapers.
RE[8]: Three strikes in the USA?
by talaf on Wed 10th Mar 2010 10:49
in reply to "RE[7]: Three strikes in the USA?"
RE[7]: Three strikes in the USA?
by Soulbender on Wed 10th Mar 2010 15:50
in reply to "RE[6]: Three strikes in the USA?"
Why don't you guys have huge armies?
Because Europe is made up of smaller countries as opposed to a single big one? If you add them all up it's not entirely unimpressive though.
Because we do, and we're your very good buddies; we're such good buddies, that we'll let you borrow ours, if you really need it.
Oh, you mean like when you need everyone else's help to take on Saddam's ragtag gang of hoodlums?





Member since:
2009-02-19
Yes, I did know that. But, frankly, the point still stands. Why don't you guys have huge armies? Because we do, and we're your very good buddies; we're such good buddies, that we'll let you borrow ours, if you really need it.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I also believe that the British and French nuclear arsenals are a tiny, tiny fraction of the US's, aren't they? I want to say the British have all of one nuclear submarine?
Not that huge nuclear arsenals are a good thing, mind! It's just that - again, so far as I know, and I could be wrong - the French and British arsenals are more tokens than real and credible deterrents.