Linked by Jesse Smith on Wed 10th Mar 2010 17:54 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 413142
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
On the Mac it’s not too bad. Sparkle is very, very common amongst cocoa apps, and Firefox provides its own updates in a timely manner. The update experience on third party Mac apps is usually so high that it downplays the benefits of using a central repository system.
I’ve _never_ had a good experience with Apt.
RE[3]: Comment by Kroc
by Johann Chua on Wed 10th Mar 2010 20:20
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Kroc"




Member since:
2006-06-19
As I understand it, if you choose to manually install the binary from Mozilla you can also set it to automatically check for future updates.
It sounds like your main concern boils down to the time it takes for the distros you've tried to provide updates. Different distros take different amounts of time.
I don't believe Mac / Windows have a centralised system for updating applications from 3rd party vendors. If you want the latest and greatest then you're free to install them yourself.