Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 14th Mar 2010 15:12 UTC
Legal It's no secret to anyone that while Apple sued HTC, the lawsuit is more about Google than HTC itself. Since Android is open source, and owned by no one, it's kind of hard to go after Google itself, and as such, HTC was the prime target, since it is the number one Android smartphone maker. The New York Times has an in-depth article up about the subject, with a whole boatload of quotes from people within the two companies, and it paints a picture of all this being a highly emotional and personal vendetta - especially from Apple's side.
Thread beginning with comment 413676
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: The App-Starter...
by neitileple on Sun 14th Mar 2010 22:28 UTC in reply to "RE: The App-Starter..."
neitileple
Member since:
2010-03-14

I'm sorry.

He writes 100 times better than me.

I registered just now to write some of my frustration, and maybe make someone think.



Greetings from: no-to-apple = neitileple.



(He doesn't know Norwegian language... My nic is in Norwegian.)

I guess Dutch have some words from Norwegian, but they are just a few...

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[3]: The App-Starter...
by Tuishimi on Sun 14th Mar 2010 22:47 in reply to "RE[2]: The App-Starter..."
Tuishimi Member since:
2005-07-06

You made me think.

You made me think that once again people miss the point.

My wife is very non-techy and she loves her iPhone because of the simplicity of the interface and the "locked down" app store that has (to her) extremely useful apps that are (again) super easy to use.

As someone else mentioned above: it's a logical choice over the iPhone on price/functionality at least for techies

That's basically what you could say about all the other "smart phones." That or "if you don't mind an ugly interface that you have to poke through to get what you want."

I am pleased for you that you like your PC with Windows 7, and it is of course a free world to espouse your beliefs and to champion your likes and belittle your dislikes, but don't do your wife and her friends/family a disservice by convincing them to drop their iPhones just because YOU don't like Apple and their policies; if they have problems with it, and you can offer a better solution, then fine. But if you just want everyone else to think and be like you, then contemplate diversity and a world where you are free to be an individual, or a sheep, but at least your option to choose.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[4]: The App-Starter...
by lemur2 on Mon 15th Mar 2010 02:40 in reply to "RE[3]: The App-Starter..."
lemur2 Member since:
2007-02-17

I am pleased for you that you like your PC with Windows 7, and it is of course a free world to espouse your beliefs and to champion your likes and belittle your dislikes, but don't do your wife and her friends/family a disservice by convincing them to drop their iPhones just because YOU don't like Apple and their policies; if they have problems with it, and you can offer a better solution, then fine. But if you just want everyone else to think and be like you, then contemplate diversity and a world where you are free to be an individual, or a sheep, but at least your option to choose.


No-one will have any option to choose if Apple are succesful (despite the fact that Apple did not invent smartphones) in their quest to become the only company that is allowed to make smartphones.

I think you are the one missing the point.

Edited 2010-03-15 02:42 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[4]: The App-Starter...
by r_a_trip on Mon 15th Mar 2010 09:56 in reply to "RE[3]: The App-Starter..."
r_a_trip Member since:
2005-07-06

I'll leave the ethical questions up to others, but...

Who is doing the technical support? If his wife is self-sufficient with a Mac, leave well alone. Politics can kill a relationship.

If she is dependent on her better/lesser half for tech support...

When I have to be the helpdesk, the second line tech support, the system builder and I can't dodge it because of blood ties, I'll try my very best to get them to accept the stuff I can and am willing to support. (Yes, I'm a mini Apple in that respect). They are free to forego my offer, but I'm very clear to them that I'm not the maid they can call in to clean up the mess, when (not if) they screw up.

When it comes to Apple. It's not on my radar as an option. While it may look ideal for a non-tech user to have an overlord deciding what is and isn't good for them, sooner or later they will find themselves on the short end of a decision. That is the price you ultimately have to pay when you opt for a little safety and convenience over freedom.

Seems hypocricital? When I exert such force too? Well, if you opt to stay ignorant of the workings of the devices you use, you will have to outsource your maintenance. One way or another, you'll have to pay the piper. At least with me, if I take on your case, it'll cost you very little. With Apple you'll pay handsomely to be owned.

Reply Parent Score: 3

jabbotts Member since:
2007-09-06

The locked down defaults are just fine. The problem is criminalizing those users who want to go beyond the basic functions of the device and make use of what the hardware is actually capable of. Again, the example of Nokia comes up with a default limited setting for there Maemo devices and a "red pill" mode for those who choose to go beyond manufacturer's recommendations. Why should advanced users be limited to protect average users?

But it's not just that; the result of unlocking the phones true potential should simply void one's warranty. A basic warning and a yes/no. At worst, it should be a civil case for breach of contract. Apple is trying to include it under DMCA law; this effectively makes it a criminal case to modify your legally purchased device and that is completely insane. No one should be held criminally responsible for breaking into there own possessions. Imagine criminal charges against someone who broke into there own home because they forgot there keys. Apple wants to invoke criminal law for what is at worst, a breach of contract and rationally, a voluntary voiding of one's warranty.

Microsoft has control issues but Apple makes Mr Balmer look like a white night crusading for the good of the consumer.

Reply Parent Score: 4