Linked by David Adams on Fri 19th Mar 2010 21:07 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 414376
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-10-27
Um; I'm a bit confused why noone mentioned StackOverflow's ads yet. I'm not well aware how successful are they with their model, but it seems they are very firm about not allowing Flash & animations. So I'd personally be highly interested in reading some comments on SO's ad system in such a "case study" article like the one above
And did you consider contacting them? maybe there'd be even some place for cooperation, with your ideas?
Now, regarding OSnews whitelisting: when using Firefox, I'm running NoScript. And I cannot imagine disabling it. Unfortunately, AFAIK it doesn't allow whitelisting scripts based on the URL where the JS is embedded; the rules are set depending on the server the script originates from, so I can't enable OSn ads without enabling whole ad servers.
On the other side, I'm recently using a Chromium variant more and more [namely: SRWare Iron - they claim it has spyware code removed], which unfortunately doesn't support NoScript... man, how complicated this world is...