To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I find those Google AdWords et al a much more pleasurable alternative to big, flashy animations. Especially since the links then actually are somehow related to the topic at hand whereas a random animation will be exactly that: random.
Besides, those Adwords and whatnot do not take any more screen real-estate than the actual content does. As such I just don't really have anything against them. I do block animations, large full-screen ads and all that rubbish, but if I could somehow switch to Adwords version of a site with no such animated crap I'd go for it.
As such, why not just allow your visitors to choose the type of advertising they prefer, and for the Flash/images/animations/etc category of ads use some brains and carefully select what kinds of ads you display?
seriously David, if you do those in-text ads on OSNews then I am gone in 2-3 days. I terribly hate those in-text ads and agree with Thom.




Member since:
1997-10-01
If we ran those in-text ads, we could probably make a couple of thousand dollars per month. Seriously. But they're horrible, and we don't run them. But I understand why some people succumb to the temptation.