Linked by David Adams on Fri 19th Mar 2010 21:07 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 414426
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-08
I don't recall ever buying anything that was advertised at me on a web page. That's just not how I make purchasing decisions. As I see it, if you get your search engine optimizations right, I'll find your product if and when I have a demand for it.
Ads aren't just annoying, the whole concept is arrogant and contemptuous. Nobody knows nearly as much about what I want than I do. This should come as no surprise to anyone, but yet advertisers still seem to be convinced that they know how to make my life better in some way that I wouldn't have otherwise considered.
Not bloody likely.
So if I can block ads, I will, and if I can't, I won't ever, ever click on them. Ever.
The struggle to find viable business models for digital content is contentious and non-trivial, and I don't pretend to have all the answers. But I doubt that advertising can be a sustainable answer to this problem in any conceivable form.
It stinks like some sort of Ponzi scheme where everybody is passing off their expenses to somebody else, terminating in a pool of investors that will dry up sooner or later when there aren't enough new suckers to replace those who have already given up waiting for positive returns.