To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I agree.
Windows Mobile followed path of Windows desktop and was designed with that path on mind. That would mean:
* do their best to support basically any kind of device which could be produced by phone makers;
* let user be free. No AppsStore: use what you want, from commercial software to home-grown one;
* let developers be free to do what they want: users will judge their job.
* only provide a basic OS: phone makers and even users will provide an extra layer for extra functionalities. Sbp software is a great example about that (I also run SBPShell on my Omnia phone upgraded to WM6.5 ;-) Xda-developers and Modaco forums are great!)
They now found out that business model is great for business market but, incredibly, it was TOO MUCH for consumers. Yeah, I really mean it.
If you look, Windows Phone is four steps behind "old" WM concept, that is :
* locked environment: Apps from AppStore only, no SD card, no native code, no m/t;
* fewer designs: competition only runs a few design (like Apple, for example) which should they be able to run ANY phone design ? That's a step behind, not forward.
* tighter control over platform: they claim it was for performance reasons but actually it was for money reasons.
* they won't rely on 3rd parties to provide enhancements to platform anymore: they will evolve the platform and 3rd parties will be able to "hook" into it.
They simple got aware they could switch to a different business model which meant less for users but more money for them. If competition does that and they make money, why should they provide a better design and be accused to live in the past ?
I repeat what I said: I'm with WM since 2003 but there won't be a Windows Phone in my future, the same way there won't be an iPhone.




Member since:
2005-07-07
Several monthe ago I upgraded to an AT&T Tilt 2 and love WinMo 6.5 and appreciate the work that went into it.
This is one in a long line of WinMo devices I've owned. As a sample, here are some: IBM WorkPad Z50, Cingular 8125, AT&T 8525, AT&T Tilt and now the Tilt 2.
I could have gotten either an iPhone or a Blackberry and a much better price but decided to stay with WinMo for several reasons:
1. Apple's iPhone Data Plan: Apple uses AT&T as an access point for the iPhone to get to the 'Net. Pointless and I don't appreciate that level of layering.
2. RIM's Data Plan: RIM uses AT&T as an access pont as well. Same reason for keeping away from layering to 'Net access.
3. If I want to go to the 'Net, I go. Straight ahead. No layered access issues.
4. Plenty of forums & tweaks out there for customization. XDA-Developers is a site I go to.
5. Great Third-Party apps out there. I'm not locked into Apple's App Store, etc. A great site for WinMo apps that have fantastic trials & demos is Spb Software. I have a few Spb S/W progs/apps on my Tilt 2 and they're great apps - never any problems. (Can't speak for RIM/Blackberry apps - no experience with them).
One of the things I've done is tried some of the home-grown ROMS for my various WinMo devices that I got at XDA-Developers. Even trying to do crazy things, I've never, 'bricked,' any of my WinMo devices. There always seems to be a way to recover a WinMo-based device if a ROM-Burn goes south. You may have to hunt for the right fix-it action, but it's been there for the times I got myself in trouble. Quite comforting.
My hopes are that MS supports WinMo 6.5 for quite some time. It's a well written OS and allows the user to customize the device beyond what's available through Mobile Marketplace, etc.
I do have some reservations about a future upgrade to WinMo 7. If the stories & articles are true about the lock-downs that may be in WinMo 7, I'll be staying with WinMo 6.5 for as long as I can.