Linked by Preston5 on Sat 27th Mar 2010 11:46 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 415515
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: why not x.264 instead of theora?
by m1cro on Sat 27th Mar 2010 19:31
in reply to "why not x.264 instead of theora?"
RE: why not x.264 instead of theora?
by darknexus on Sat 27th Mar 2010 19:33
in reply to "why not x.264 instead of theora?"
Why argumenting about h.264 against theora and not "h.264 against x.264" as codecs instead?
Because X264 *is* an H.264 encoder and decoder? It implements the H.264 standard and, in countries where software patents screw everyone, X264 is not legal just as any other unlicensed H.264 encoder is not.
RE[2]: why not x.264 instead of theora?
by riha on Sat 27th Mar 2010 19:46
in reply to "RE: why not x.264 instead of theora?"





Member since:
2006-01-24
Why argumenting about h.264 against theora and not "h.264 against x.264" as codecs instead?