Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 29th Mar 2010 12:59 UTC, submitted by NiceGuyEddie
Games The PlayStation 3 Slim already had an ability penalty of -35 Geekiness because of its lack of the "Install Other OS" option, and now the regular PlayStation 3 will follow in its footsteps. A PS3 firmware update, scheduled to land April 1, will disable this option on regular PS3s as well. This, dear readers, is what we in the business call a "testicle move", especially since only a few weeks ago, Sony bold-facedly claimed the feature would not be removed.
Thread beginning with comment 415742
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
April Fools?
by qroon on Mon 29th Mar 2010 13:08 UTC
Member since:

I mean, they said April 1 right? (hoping)

Reply Score: 5

RE: April Fools?
by WereCatf on Mon 29th Mar 2010 13:10 in reply to "April Fools?"
WereCatf Member since:

I mean, they said April 1 right? (hoping)

This news has already generated insane amounts of bad press. It'd be horribly idiotic to make such an April's Fools joke. Though, Sony IS idiotic, but they are not the kind of company to make jokes.

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[2]: April Fools?
by Odwalla on Tue 30th Mar 2010 00:20 in reply to "RE: April Fools?"
Odwalla Member since:

Define 'insane amounts' of bad press. This announcement won't do anything to PS3 sales whatsoever. Linux devotees have had 4+ years to buy a PS3 if they wanted Linux on it. The vast (and I mean *vast*) majority of people who might be interested in a PS3 are interested in it for entertainment purposes. The inclusion or removal of a dual boot feature means nothing to them.

Reply Parent Score: 6

RE[2]: April Fools?
by graigsmith on Tue 30th Mar 2010 03:24 in reply to "RE: April Fools?"
graigsmith Member since:

this is bad press? i thought bad press would be like you know. a video game system that couldn't play games. or a video game system that crashed and you had to go buy a new one. i mean really. no one cared if it ran linux. and hardly anynone used linux on their ps3.. mostly because it sucked.

Reply Parent Score: 3

v RE: April Fools?
by Kroc on Mon 29th Mar 2010 13:26 in reply to "April Fools?"
RE[2]: April Fools?
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Mon 29th Mar 2010 14:54 in reply to "RE: April Fools?"
Bill Shooter of Bul Member since:

Dude, there are no rules for april fools. Well, just one, it has to involve april 1st as a date. That's it.

However, this isn't funny enough or provocative enough to be a good joke. So its either a lame april fools joke, or real.

So does Sony have a really bad sense of humour or are they just sadistic? Really tough to determine the answer to that one. Asked in the absence of any other context its a toss up.

Reply Parent Score: 6