Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 29th Mar 2010 09:48 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless There are various trains of thought regarding Apple suing HTC, and one of them is that Apple feels threatened by Android's rise in popularity. Some laughed this away, but when you look at recent statistics regarding mobile web usage, it becomes pretty clear Apple has every reason to feel threatened by Google's mobile operating system.
Thread beginning with comment 415756
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: iPhone vs. Android
by majipoor on Mon 29th Mar 2010 13:50 UTC in reply to "iPhone vs. Android"
majipoor
Member since:
2009-01-22

1. FYI, Apple does not only sell in the US and it sells on multiple carriers often. But it would sell better in the US indeed without exclusivity.

2. Agree mostly. Approval policy is however not a critical point IMHO as it concern only a small fraction of developers. My guess if that this will be addressed somehow soon (iPhone OS 4)

3. Don't agree. This is mostly BS from tech saavy people. But multi-tasking is more important on the iPad and it should comes with iPhoneOS 4, at least on the iPad.

4. iPhone 3GS is snappy and I don't feel a real need for better performances. The iPhone 3GS is however now 1 year old and you will most probably get a boost un performances with iPhone 4G within 2-3 months.

5. I like OLED (I'm a shareholder in Universal Display ;) , but NOW, AMOLED are not much better as they are worst in some circumstances. Moreover, AFAIK, not enough AMOLED screens are produced worldwide for the iPhone (remember: the Nexus One has been sold 200k only). OLED screen will come to iPhone someday, but not in the immediate future and I don't see it as a real issue.

6. I would say then that this segment of the market is not targeted by Apple. I don't think Apple want to target 100% of smartphone market.

Conclusion: iPhoneOS 4 and iPhone 4G should push Apple ahead of other actors again in smartphone market and considering that Apple has also iPod Touch and now iPad running on iPhoneOS platform, I would say that the iPhoneOS platform is WELL ahead of competitirs in mobile devices market.

Because indeed most of you forget to see the iPhoneOS as a platform, the iPhone being only one part of this platform (same for Android which is probably the only true competitor to iPhoneOS).

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: iPhone vs. Android
by spiderman on Mon 29th Mar 2010 14:51 in reply to "RE: iPhone vs. Android"
spiderman Member since:
2008-10-23


Conclusion: iPhoneOS 4 and iPhone 4G should push Apple ahead of other actors again in smartphone market and considering that Apple has also iPod Touch and now iPad running on iPhoneOS platform, I would say that the iPhoneOS platform is WELL ahead of competitirs in mobile devices market.

Because indeed most of you forget to see the iPhoneOS as a platform, the iPhone being only one part of this platform (same for Android which is probably the only true competitor to iPhoneOS).

Even including the iPod and the iPad, the iPhoneOS is far from the big OS in term of market share. It's ahead in pinching but not in market share, far from it.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: iPhone vs. Android
by troyfarrell on Mon 29th Mar 2010 17:25 in reply to "RE: iPhone vs. Android"
troyfarrell Member since:
2010-03-29

On the topic of multitasking on a phone...

3. Don't agree. This is mostly BS from tech saavy people. But multi-tasking is more important on the iPad and it should comes with iPhoneOS 4, at least on the iPad.

Have you ever used a webOS device? Multitasking is a big deal on a smartphone and Palm got it right.

Full-disclosure: I own a (non-refurbished) first-generation Palm Pre. I love it.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: iPhone vs. Android
by scofmb on Mon 29th Mar 2010 18:04 in reply to "RE: iPhone vs. Android"
scofmb Member since:
2010-02-20

Multitasking is really usefull and you didnt give any reason to disagree.. i love been able to browser, copy some txt i want and paste it in evernote.... i know you can do that in the iphone, but here u dont need to "close" the browser.
or reading an epub, find a word i dont know and go to search for a definition in google without having to wait to the app to load.

Sry.. multitasking is really useful for me and im not a techsaavy.

and btw, checking your comments.. do you work for apple? u only comment on news related to them and only to praise them

Edited 2010-03-29 18:07 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[3]: iPhone vs. Android
by Chaos_One on Tue 30th Mar 2010 06:33 in reply to "RE[2]: iPhone vs. Android"
Chaos_One Member since:
2005-07-18

Actually, Safari on the iPhone doesn't get closed when you switch to another application. Safari, Mail and the music player all keep running in the background.

I don't miss multitasking on my iPhone. It would be nice to have it on the iPad though, but I single task on my iPhone.

Reply Parent Score: 1