To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"Write down a list of 10 applications which really scales better on [Solaris]. I think you couldn't because those are all inhouse developed applications what you never heard of."
A quick google found SAP. How about SAP? That is not an inhouse app, no? The Linux machine used faster CPUs, and faster RAM, and still was slower than Solaris on enterprise SAP benchmark, on 48 core machines. Linux scales well to 4 sockets or so. But above that, Linux has problems.
http://download.sap.com/download.epd?context=B1FEF26EB0CC34664FC7E8...
http://download.sap.com/download.epd?context=40E2D9D5E00EEF7CCDB058...
I think it says it all, when you claim you have no real experience of Solaris and still down talk it. It is really funny. Some Linux guy sits with his dual core at home and never has any problems, and therefore he concludes that Linux scales well? Jesus. It is a whole different thing to handle massive loads. Linux sucks on big loads, or trying to handle load on as few as 48 cores. Amateurs.
http://www.mattheaton.com/?p=222
Linux sucks as a file server says a Storage Expert
http://www.enterprisestorageforum.com/sans/features/article.php/374...
http://www.enterprisestorageforum.com/sans/features/article.php/374...
SEGEDUNUM
There are several Linux shops that switches to Solaris. If you didnt knew that, I am sorry for you.
"Linux does not scale well, so we switch to Solaris"
http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,s...
Linux overcommits RAM by default. That is horrendously bad. Linux allows you to use more RAM than the swap file allows. Then Linux will kill processes randomly. How good is that for stability?
http://opsmonkey.blogspot.com/2007/01/linux-memory-overcommit.html
And Linux unstable ABI, how good is that for stability? Upgrade something, and something else crashes. Soon you will have upgraded everything.




Member since:
2005-12-16
"Super high" loads like what? scientific applications?
I had linux and bsd servers with super high loads mostly used for lamp, web loadbalancers and they do just as well.
The only reason why Solaris, AIX still has market because some mission critical systems are built with them and they provide abilities such as hotswapping cpus,memory etc. or keep running in case of kernel panic.
I never had to work with solaris more than install and maintain it but my opinion is that its a major crap system and all the pros I heard from people like you is exactly like this.
80% of the ISPs use solaris, for what?
Asterisk works better on solaris, orly?
Write down a list of 10 applications which really scales better on it. I think you couldn't because those are all inhouse developed applications what you never heard of.
Edited 2010-03-30 23:14 UTC