Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 30th Mar 2010 22:21 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Thread beginning with comment 416147
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by BluenoseJake
by Soulbender on Wed 31st Mar 2010 17:01
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by BluenoseJake"
The new Amarok interface is one of the biggest and ugliest wastes of space I've ever seen in a GUI
yeah, it's pretty damn awfull. I prefef Bangarang over Amarok though.
I noticed it does not work in Chakra... is it possible?
That seems to be something in Chakra since clicking on them does switch them in Kubuntu Lucid.
I do like some of the things that KDE is doing, but these examples remind me of the braindead things the businessmen of for-profit businesses would do
Amarok isn't part of KDE SC actually.
RE[4]: Comment by BluenoseJake
by rub3nmv on Wed 31st Mar 2010 21:00
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by BluenoseJake"
Since 2.2, the Amarok interface is really customizable.
This is how mine looks:
http://imgur.com/H9U6E.png
And here's another example:
http://kde-look.org/CONTENT/content-pre1/122305-1.png
You can also change toolbar to slim.




Member since:
2006-12-05
Well, next time I try out Chakra (or some other 4.4 distro) I'll have to find that. But seriously, WTF?! Reduced functionality is not ALWAYS good! The new Amarok interface is one of the biggest and ugliest wastes of space I've ever seen in a GUI (as were the openSUSE 11.2 version's, but at least they left less open space).
One more question though. Once again in Amarok, I have been using the capability of just clicking either the time elapsed or time remaining to switch the two around. I noticed it does not work in Chakra... is it possible? For some reason my mind works better one way--and not the way that seems to be default. I do like having, at a glance, both the time remaining and time elapsed though--but my mind just works better when they're in a certain direction. Based on the previous response, my guess is that they for some reason butchered that too. Simplifying is good, but these are two examples of butchering too far.
I do like some of the things that KDE is doing, but these examples remind me of the braindead things the businessmen of for-profit businesses would do. Which, ironically, I was trying to get away from when I ditched Windows.
Edited 2010-03-31 06:51 UTC