Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 31st Mar 2010 21:55 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 416321
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-04
The iPhone, iTouch and iPad don't have a "pointing and control device" - other than your finger - for it to be emulating, so I don't think this will fly against those devices.
In the interest of promoting discussion as opposed to nitpicking your post:
The patent doesn't specify that the implemented functionality is emulating a pointing and control device that already exists on the device in question, just that it emulates one. Maybe even one that isn't on the device because it has an emulator instead of the p and c device.
To my way of thinking this doesn't mean that the patent doesn't apply to Apple's i-devices, just that your example, by invoking the non-existent restriction of already having to have such an interface device and then providing an additional emulated one, doesn't capture the meaning of the patent's claims.
Does that make sense to you or do I just sound like I'm trying to make you look bad? Sorry if the latter.