Linked by kloty on Tue 6th Apr 2010 21:22 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 417474
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: The desktop is overrated unless you need quad core
by strcpy on Wed 7th Apr 2010 05:16
in reply to "The desktop is overrated unless you need quad core"
RE[2]: The desktop is overrated unless you need quad core
by nt_jerkface on Wed 7th Apr 2010 06:03
in reply to "RE: The desktop is overrated unless you need quad core"
Yea well my response was more towards the other comments here.
I actually found the article's premise to be absurd. People do not want to edit photos or spreadsheets inside iPhones or iPads. Tablet computers will be purchased as secondary devices. They'd have to get to ~200 dollars to even have widespread adoption. Most people would still be willing to pay a little more for a netbook with a keyboard.
RE: The desktop is overrated unless you need quad core
by fatjoe on Wed 7th Apr 2010 06:56
in reply to "The desktop is overrated unless you need quad core"
RE[2]: The desktop is overrated unless you need quad core
by nt_jerkface on Wed 7th Apr 2010 16:42
in reply to "RE: The desktop is overrated unless you need quad core"
Doesn't matter because I need a notebook for mobility and since my current notebook has ample performance there is no point in me keeping multiple workspaces.
Desktops are good if you need a quad core but it's a very tiny percentage of the population that can actually make use of one. Gamers and modelers mostly.




Member since:
2009-08-26
Once notebooks came out with dual core cpus the desktop was in trouble.
My typical workload this month consists of 2-3 instances of Visual Studio, an instance of VirtualBox running Windows and a few open utilities and my Core 2 Duo notebook handles everything just fine.
Desktops won't go away but they reached their peak years ago.