Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 8th Apr 2010 12:20 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 417756
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-06-29
Did I say anything different? Of course you'll lose your official warranty, I said so quite clearly (I wonder how you missed that).
My point is this: whereas tech companies are trying to lock you out of their devices, and force you to take service from them and them alone, this is not the case in the automotive world, since you can have your car serviced wherever you want - all the information and training required MUST be made available to ALL shops; official dealer or no. This is LAW.
Despite that clear difference, people are saying that it's okay for tech companies to close their devices like this "because car companies do it too" - which is patently untrue. I'm arguing that the automotive model (one supplier, but many places to go for parts and service) is a superior model that leads to more competition, lower prices, and better longevity.