Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 9th Apr 2010 17:43 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Thread beginning with comment 418212
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: I dont believe this
by wanker90210 on Mon 12th Apr 2010 08:42
in reply to "RE[2]: I dont believe this"
In some projects I've been thrown shit legacy code. Redoing one part from spaghetti crap to clean code can have an amazing effect on the rest of the code. A start from scratch is not always a magic pill but is the thing funniest for the programmers so they always suggest that.
I don't want to imagine what horror MacOS 9 was but I can imagine how much easier it must have been to get out of the pit with a solid unix kernel in the bottom and some likeable Next libs.
This QNX thing must not necessarily go down the drain. It could be good.




Member since:
2007-06-24
Sadly you are so right on the spot with this history lesson. The OS will not save a sinking/sank ship, only moving to another OS that has a fresh start. Someone once said, its easier to give birth than resurrect the dead.