Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 10th Apr 2010 10:47 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 418300
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
In all seriousness, why would Apple advocate HTML 5 as a replacement for Flash when HTML 5 is an open standard? Where's the lock in there?
Apple only advocate HTML5 in conjunction with the h.264 codec.
There is the lock-in right there.
Fortunately, Firefox, Opera, Google Chrome and IE (via the Google Chrome Frame plugin) all support HTML5/Theora, but Firefox and Opera do not support HTML5/h264 (Safari supports ONLY HTML5/h264).
There is an Opera Mini app submitted to the iPhone App Store
http://www.opera.com/press/releases/2010/03/23_3/
If Apple allow that, the iPhone/iPad would also support HTML5/Theora.
That would break Apple's attempt at lock-in.




Member since:
2009-03-27
If Apple is really pushing to chuck Adobe by the wayside, it's going to have to create some alternative for developers and designers.
Maybe somewhere in Cupertino there is an iFlash being developed?
Maybe Gnash is about to receive a huge code dump...?
</rampant half-serious speculation>
In all seriousness, why would Apple advocate HTML 5 as a replacement for Flash when HTML 5 is an open standard? Where's the lock in there? I agree with you, Thom, that Apple's other moves are pro-lock in, so why are they taking this one step back? (Or one step forward, as it were.)
Does Silverlight have a Mac version, I wonder?