To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I don't believe Thom said he opposed copyright. Just that the original copyright law (which ran for a maximum of 28 years) was vastly superior to what we have now (his exact words being "one can't help but hope we will return to those days").
The big problem with modern copyright law is that it simply runs for too long, and keeps getting longer, largely thanks to lobbying by Disney to protect its Micky Mouse franchise. It's ridiculous that photos taken during the great depression of the 1930s are still "protected" by copyright.
Edited 2010-04-11 23:14 UTC
Even earlier than the 30's actually, no copyright has entered public domain since 1923.
http://books.google.com/books?id=tRwsKG2LBGkC&printsec=frontcover&d...
< OFFTOPIC>
Posting this from a netbook running ChromeOS
< /OFFTOPIC>




Member since:
2005-07-23
Thanks Thom for a very well written and insightful historical perspective. I love it.
Now, I just wanted to highlight a delicious irony that jumped at me when I looked at the bottom of the page in the "printable version":
All trademarks, icons, and logos shown or mentioned in this web site are the property of their respective owners.
Reproduction of OSNews stories is permitted only with explicit authorization from OSNews. Reproductions must be properly credited.
(emphasis mine)
Maybe it's time to evaluate copyleft licenses for OSNews contents? I'm just sayin'