Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 15th Apr 2010 10:42 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 419249
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Much Ado About Nothing
by tyrione on Fri 16th Apr 2010 00:32
in reply to "Much Ado About Nothing"
I just blogged about this (http://asisaid.com/journal/article/1532.html).
Why is everyone assuming a prohibition on using unique device identifiers has an correlation to ad analytics? If the program requests the ad directly -- and not through a proxy -- the advertiser will still get an IP address. Likewise, if a user is logged in, the server can still know that kind of stuff.
In other words, this just insists iPhone apps cannot be spyware. Ads can continue to operate as they do on web sites. As to Apple's own practices, I assume we will find out more about those as they update their own privacy policies and license agreements.
Why is everyone assuming a prohibition on using unique device identifiers has an correlation to ad analytics? If the program requests the ad directly -- and not through a proxy -- the advertiser will still get an IP address. Likewise, if a user is logged in, the server can still know that kind of stuff.
In other words, this just insists iPhone apps cannot be spyware. Ads can continue to operate as they do on web sites. As to Apple's own practices, I assume we will find out more about those as they update their own privacy policies and license agreements.
Correct, but all things Apple on OSNews is TeaParty'ish quite often.
RE[2]: Much Ado About Nothing
by kristoph on Fri 16th Apr 2010 01:13
in reply to "RE: Much Ado About Nothing"





Member since:
2005-07-06
I just blogged about this (http://asisaid.com/journal/article/1532.html).
Why is everyone assuming a prohibition on using unique device identifiers has an correlation to ad analytics? If the program requests the ad directly -- and not through a proxy -- the advertiser will still get an IP address. Likewise, if a user is logged in, the server can still know that kind of stuff.
In other words, this just insists iPhone apps cannot be spyware. Ads can continue to operate as they do on web sites. As to Apple's own practices, I assume we will find out more about those as they update their own privacy policies and license agreements.