Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 18th Apr 2010 11:57 UTC, submitted by Anonymous
Thread beginning with comment 419693
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-10-19
This sounds to me like a solution looking for a problem.
Has there been a steep rise in panicky users calling up Google asking what 'http://' means?
I don't think so. So why mess with it?
This is fairly common with companies that are dealing with software concepts that have been around for a long time, and are desperately trying to think of something they can do to make it better/cooler.
Often, as with a painting, there comes a time when you should just walk away and stop trying to add new features. Otherwise you risk winding up with products like:
- Photoshop
- iTunes
- Microsoft Office
Of course the sales guys aren't normally thrilled with this philosophy!