Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 21st Apr 2010 22:55 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 420240
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Miguel claims that Monotouch is ok
by nt_jerkface on Thu 22nd Apr 2010 16:31
in reply to "RE[2]: Miguel claims that Monotouch is ok"
I don't see MonoTouch picking up any (sane) new developers in the coming months due to the cloud of FUD that's now surrounding the product.
Miguel should just focus on MonoDroid and forget about Apple. They're purposely not responding to him to discourage the use of MonoTouch. They want it to sit in a cloud of $400 FUD so developers go with Apple's sdk instead.
This is really lame given how few apps are probably written with MonoTouch. It isn't as if Apple has a shortage of Mac-only iphone developers. Apple is not going to gain converts by doing this.




Member since:
2009-09-07
*Sarcasm mode*
So Apple's profet The Mighty Steveness has in his infinite mercy graciously(1) allowed MonoTouch and Unity3D entry to the hallowed halls of The Holy iPhone... for now.
*End Sarcasm mode*
Well excuse me for not going out and immediately dumping 400$ on a MonoTouch license. Apple and His Steveness are fickle masters and they might say one thing today and the complete opposite tomorrow.
I think there are quite a few people thinking along the same lines out there. I don't see MonoTouch picking up any (sane) new developers in the coming months due to the cloud of FUD that's now surrounding the product. Even if Apple does nothing, which is the most likely IMO. Apple tends to have a mushroom management(2) approach to informing people outside the company about stuff.
(1): If you are reading this aloud, remember to roll the r, and try to ham it up a bit ;-)
(2): "keep 'em in the dark and feed 'em s%!t"---mostly keeping people in the dark
Edited 2010-04-22 09:19 UTC