Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 26th Apr 2010 23:11 UTC, submitted by UglyKidBill
Thread beginning with comment 420883
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: A crime is a crime
by Tony Swash on Mon 26th Apr 2010 23:32
in reply to "RE: A crime is a crime"
"Not a bright idea to buy property that belongs to someone else and then blog about it.
Had Gizmodo not bought the phone and blogged about it...
...would Apple have had the phone back this quickly?
Just playing devil's advocate here. "
I think the point is that the real value of the phone is that it is a secret industrial prototype. If it had just disappeared then Apple would have been concerned but not much more - the blogging (ie revealing the stolen industrial secret) was the bit that pushed a nuisance event into something more serious. As much as I defend the freedom of the press I think I would draw the line at buying and then publishing stolen industrial secrets for gain. Its just not right.
RE[2]: A crime is a crime
by toast88 on Tue 27th Apr 2010 00:37
in reply to "RE: A crime is a crime"
"Not a bright idea to buy property that belongs to someone else and then blog about it.
Had Gizmodo not bought the phone and blogged about it...
...would Apple have had the phone back this quickly?
Just playing devil's advocate here. "
True. But this still doesn't alter the facts that he dealt with stolen property which is a crime in most countries and now he has to deal with the consequences. I assume that Mr. Chen is smart enough to have been aware of that before committing that. And since they're hopefully not going to put him into jail for 20 years but just fine him with a big amount I don't really feel any pity for him. The number of page hits generated several millions of revenues so he should be able to pay it, shouldn't he?
Adrian
RE[2]: A crime is a crime
by sigzero on Tue 27th Apr 2010 00:47
in reply to "RE: A crime is a crime"
RE[2]: A crime is a crime
by tyrione on Tue 27th Apr 2010 04:16
in reply to "RE: A crime is a crime"
"Not a bright idea to buy property that belongs to someone else and then blog about it.
Had Gizmodo not bought the phone and blogged about it...
...would Apple have had the phone back this quickly?
Just playing devil's advocate here. "
Ignorance of the Law is not a defensible position in the United States of America.
RE[2]: A crime is a crime
by phoenix on Tue 27th Apr 2010 05:36
in reply to "RE: A crime is a crime"
"Not a bright idea to buy property that belongs to someone else and then blog about it.
Had Gizmodo not bought the phone and blogged about it...
...would Apple have had the phone back this quickly?
Just playing devil's advocate here. "
Doesn't matter. In most US jurisdictions, knowingly buying stolen property is a crime. Regardless of the "intent" behind. And it doesn't get much more "knowingly" than blogging about it.
As for the person who found it, they can be charged with selling stolen property, aka fencing.
RE[2]: A crime is a crime
by Gone fishing on Tue 27th Apr 2010 05:30
in reply to "RE: A crime is a crime"





Member since:
2006-03-27
Doesn't matter how you sugar coat it.
Not a bright idea to buy property that belongs to someone else and then blog about it.