To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
At the end of the day Gizmodo was wrong on this, and while the iPhone was returned you have to think that if they did this what other things have they payed for and not divulged yet. Is the person they got the phone from someone who does this regularly, if so is Gizmodo one of his regular customers? If the device was stolen as I'm inclined to think then Chen is an accomplice in this crime, even more so by paying for known stolen property.
The sad thing about this is that Chen and those like him seem to be too stupid to ask the simple question
"Does what they're doing pass the Pawn Shop Test?"
If you don't know what that is, go a pawn shop and ask the owner how do they determine what to buy and what not to buy from someone who walks in from the street.




Member since:
2007-02-17
At the end of the day Gizmodo was wrong on this, and while the iPhone was returned you have to think that if they did this what other things have they payed for and not divulged yet. Is the person they got the phone from someone who does this regularly, if so is Gizmodo one of his regular customers? If the device was stolen as I'm inclined to think then Chen is an accomplice in this crime, even more so by paying for known stolen property.
Apple is going overboard but like I said before on this subject, Apple's main marketing tool is their secrecy. The hype that builds before their product is released is a huge staple of their marketing push. Its by design and has been so for years. Chen and Gizmodo basically just punched all the wind out of Apple's sails and to top it off they basically through it in Apple's face by actually taking the device apart.
This doesn't excuse Apple, but frankly if I were in their shoes and I had the means I would find anyway to retaliate against Gizmodo. Its childish, I know. Isn't their an editor over at Gizmodo who's job it is to make sure this doesn't happen.