Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 26th Apr 2010 23:11 UTC, submitted by UglyKidBill
Thread beginning with comment 420940
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: A crime is a crime
by Wondercool on Tue 27th Apr 2010 11:52
in reply to "RE[4]: A crime is a crime"
RE[6]: A crime is a crime
by funny_irony on Tue 27th Apr 2010 15:09
in reply to "RE[5]: A crime is a crime"
RE[5]: A crime is a crime
by BallmerKnowsBest on Wed 28th Apr 2010 02:42
in reply to "RE[4]: A crime is a crime"
I can guarantee if it was a secret prototype of something by Microsoft or Sony or Palm or Nokia they would be pushing just as hard to get to the bottom of how it all happened.
Funny, I don't recall Microsoft, Sony, Palm, or Nokia ever getting into this sort of situation in the first place. Probably because none of those companies are retarded enough to test their secret prototypes in a pub.





Member since:
2006-04-03
Except that by law the minute it was taken without the express intent of returning it to it's owner or the authorities, it became stolen property. Anyone purchasing that property is receiving stolen goods. They're two pretty simple laws that were broken. I agree that if it was your or my phone it wouldn't be handled this way, but I can guarantee if it was a secret prototype of something by Microsoft or Sony or Palm or Nokia they would be pushing just as hard to get to the bottom of how it all happened.
None of us here know all the facts. For all we know there could be conflicting stories about how it came to be in the hands of the person who sold it to Gizmodo, or any number of other possibilities. The bottom line is that one person chose to put the story above the law, and that's just plain stupid.