To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Can trade secrets economically improve thousands of people's lives through increased business, tax revenue, share prices, and jobs? Losing trade secrets can be bad for lots of people. Losing one person's data on a phone is bad for one person.
I think both cases, the law tries to provide equal protection. Stealing a person's data is as illegal as stealing a company's data. So the hard question comes from allocating finite resources, and politically, I think it's defensible to do what results in the largest benefit first. One person's computer getting hacked will likely not result in anything. A bank getting hacked and having millions of people's information stolen should.
You could argue a company's profits should be less important than an individual's data . . . but from the viewpoint of the government, it might not be. As long as identity theft and such is always something that happens to "someone else" and businesses cay say "we're losing $$$", I don't think there will be enough social pressure to change priorities.
At the risk of repeating myself...
Patents? Copyrights? Trademarks? NDAs? Those together (with money) offer more than enough protection and legal handles for companies.
Edited 2010-04-27 13:17 UTC
Oh Thom. Please, your ignorance knows no bounds.
You think this is the ONLY investigation that the DA/police are engaged in. Otherwise, they have been sitting in their offices eating donuts, just waiting for good 'ol SJ to come a callin'? (as if he ever would...)
Please, you probably have a Window update to install, please take care of that...
So, let me ask you the question again.
Would law enforcement put as much effort into retrieving your phone as they are putting into this case? Are you really so naive as to believe that Apple's involvement with this particular task force does not play a major role in the vigour with which they pursue this matter?





Member since:
2005-06-29
And a company's secrets are more important than, say, my own secrets I might have stored on my phone? Why can a company have this extra layer of protection and command an extra army of police, but a mere citizen like I cannot?
How is that fair? How can anyone - an American especially - not see the inequality and class justice going on here?