To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Do we even know what this alleged person said to Apple? It could have been something along the lines of "If you want your phone back I want $10,000." For which Apple says screw you and locks the phone instead. Not having received anything from Apple he then goes on to contact tech blogs interested in pics and actually got a sucker to buy the device. In-fact that seems about the gist of it to me. If he was really serious about returning it Apple he would have dropped it off at a police station or dropped it in a Fedex box and shipped it to Apple. Blackmailing Apple for the return of the device (as I'm inclined to think is what happened) does not constitute contacting Apple, imo. Its like someone (and this does happen)keeping your wallet or phone at ransom if you don;t pay them compensation. You as the person who lost said object are not obligated to do so and can report whoever contacted as a thief if your stuff is not returned to you.





Member since:
2006-06-01
Ah but here's where you are wrong. According to Gizmodo's own article, the guy who "found" the phone in the bar did not tell the bartender or owner of the bar that he had found said phone, he just took the phone home with him and kept it/played with it for a week or so until he sold it to Gizmodo. This is where the story falls apart and where the legal problems begin. When you find someone's keys on the floor of a bar you give them to the bartender or at the very least you tell him you found them so that when the owner notices he's lost them and asks the bartender if anyone has found any keys they can be returned. This is basic common sense, people! The fact that the "unknown person" did not do any of this turns the whole incident into theft and by that makes Gizmodo complicit in the theft when they bought the phone later on.