Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 26th Apr 2010 23:11 UTC, submitted by UglyKidBill
Thread beginning with comment 421014
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Warning Across the Bows
by Thom_Holwerda on Tue 27th Apr 2010 14:50
in reply to "RE[6]: Warning Across the Bows"
Got it?
Quite clear you have no idea what this is about. At all.
The string of comments you replied to (namely, this one) is about whether or not trade secrets should exist. I explained that no, they do not, since there are already enough, far more effective and clearer means of achieving the same goal.
//I then explained that trade secrets are unnecessary, since we already have NDAs, patents, copyrights, and trademarks.//
Yay. And if those NDAs, patents, copyrights and trademarks are violated, law enforcement comes in to enforce the laws that were broken by violating those NDAs, patents, copyrights and trademarks.
Which is what happened here.
Yay. And if those NDAs, patents, copyrights and trademarks are violated, law enforcement comes in to enforce the laws that were broken by violating those NDAs, patents, copyrights and trademarks.
Which is what happened here.
*sigh*
None of the above have happened here.
- If an NDA has been violated, then the police has NO business at Chen's house. An NDA is a contract between the employer and employee, and Chen is neither. If an NDA has been broken here, the police ought to go after the Apple employee. However, and here's the crux, breaking an NDA is breach of contract - which is a civil matter, not a criminal one.
- What patents have been violated here?
- What copyrights have been violated?
- What trademarks have been violated?
You really have no clue as to what's going on here, do you?




Member since:
2010-04-21
//I then explained that trade secrets are unnecessary, since we already have NDAs, patents, copyrights, and trademarks.//
Yay. And if those NDAs, patents, copyrights and trademarks are violated, law enforcement comes in to enforce the laws that were broken by violating those NDAs, patents, copyrights and trademarks.
Which is what happened here.
Got it?