Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 26th Apr 2010 23:11 UTC, submitted by UglyKidBill
Thread beginning with comment 421032
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
There's no reason to assume that Apple gave anyone permission to take it off company grounds.
Last I read, Apple still had not fired or otherwise disciplined the employee who lost it. Given they recently fired an engineer for showing Steve Wozniak a 3G iPad for two minutes after being given explicit written permission to show said device...I'm inclined to believe the guy who lost the iPhone had been told to take it off campus, perhaps for testing. If that is the case, by law it had to be FCC approved, and therefore it is no longer a trade secret as it would now be in their database in detail.
On that note, has anyone bothered to check out its certification (or lack thereof)?
Last I read, Apple still had not fired or otherwise disciplined the employee who lost it.
So what is your point? Does this in any way negate the fact that this phone contained trade secrets? Was this a product purchased at an at&t store? No, it was a secret prototype that they were keeping from their competitors.
How Apple handles this internally is irrelevant. This was an internal prototype that Gizmodo purchased under dubious circumstances. If you're looking for a reason to hate Apple then look elsewhere and you can find plenty of reasons. In this case Gizmodo is the guilty party, they shouldn't have bought property that they knew belonged to Apple.
Apple had every right to contact the authorities. Gizmodo not only illegally purchased Apple property but also profited from it through increased ad revenue. They wanted a breaking story and were willing to step outside the law to get it. The shocking thing is how they made no attempt to cover their trail.
Hey guys look at this Apple prototype we purchased from some random guy for 5000 dollars! Neat-o! Here's my picture with it!!!
Oh but we shouldn't be arrested cuz they guy we bought it from says Apple doesn't care.
So freaking stupid, I just can't believe it.
"It's obviously a product in development which is a trade secret. "
Yeah right, a bar is really the obvious place for a product in development which is a trade secret!
It is Apple's mistake. Apple lost and now all this is about revenge. It does not matter anymore to Apple if Chen did wrong or right.





Member since:
2009-08-26
It's obviously a product in development which is a trade secret.
There's no reason to assume that Apple gave anyone permission to take it off company grounds.