Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 26th Apr 2010 23:11 UTC, submitted by UglyKidBill
Thread beginning with comment 421066
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: You know it could be
by Tuishimi on Tue 27th Apr 2010 18:38
in reply to "RE: You know it could be"
RE[2]: You know it could be
by sorpigal on Wed 28th Apr 2010 12:06
in reply to "RE: You know it could be"
It's worse than that, really. For a guy like this his computers are his livelihood. The data on his computers, especially his servers, are also likely to be vitally important. Seizing someone's property is inconvenient, but in a case like this it might be financially ruinous if not returned within a few days.




Member since:
2005-06-29
Excellent point, but as I've said previously they could have accomplished that with a friendly subpoena. I still firmly believe the search warrant was an unnecessary move designed to intimidate Mr. Chen. Unless he has something to hide, complying with a subpoena request for information on his computers would be far less invasive and he'd have his equipment back within a few days. With a search warrant, the computers will be classified as evidence and he will be lucky to get them back before they're obsolete.