Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 26th Apr 2010 23:11 UTC, submitted by UglyKidBill
Thread beginning with comment 421084
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: comment by kedwards
by nt_jerkface on Tue 27th Apr 2010 20:49
in reply to "RE: comment by kedwards"
Especially when the purchaser knows who the owner is. Gizmodo knew the phone was not privately purchased and in fact an internal prototype from a nearby company. That's why they purchased it and it's a felony since the value of the phone is over $1000. Felony warrants for possession often result in a house raid, especially for computer related crimes.




Member since:
2006-12-15
After reading all the information, Apple has enough evidence(all of which are on Gizmodo's own website) to try Gizmodo in civil court. Gizmodo harmed Apple by telling Apple's competitors what they are working on, nothing more nothing less.
Under California law, taking a lost item without taking proper steps to return it is theft. Items over a certain value need to be turned into the police if the owner can't be contacted.