Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 28th Apr 2010 14:31 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 421252
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Am I missing something?
by kristoph on Wed 28th Apr 2010 16:09
in reply to "RE: Am I missing something?"
What is interesting here is that HTC is essentially paying royalties to MIcrosoft for Android technologies. That's a bad precedent but, in fairness to HTC they probably did not want to be sued to two of the largest companies on the planet at the same time,
No doubt the Apple patent issue will be resolved in a smilliar way.
The biggest issue is for Google. If a perception develops that using Android requires paying royalties to microsoft and apple it will reduce the appeal of Android to handset manufacturers and fast.
K
RE[3]: Am I missing something?
by WorknMan on Wed 28th Apr 2010 20:10
in reply to "RE[2]: Am I missing something?"
What is interesting here is that HTC is essentially paying royalties to MIcrosoft for Android technologies. That's a bad precedent but, in fairness to HTC they probably did not want to be sued to two of the largest companies on the planet at the same time
Sounds kind of like a schoolyard bully who demands your lunch money, else he's gonna kick your ass.





Member since:
2005-11-12
From what I can see, it's if HTC use any patented technology that Microsoft have in their portfolio. If HTC do use such patented technologies, then Microsoft will receive royalties from that.
It's a more sensible way of doing business rather than suing, which is what Apple are doing.
Edited 2010-04-28 15:28 UTC