Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 28th Apr 2010 14:31 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 421283
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-05-26
Microsoft entered into some agreement in regards to Microsoft's patents that they own and have a right to license out: this in no way means that Microsoft has any connection with Apple and their patents whatsoever in this matter, and anything stating that Apple patents are involved is baseless speculation, period.
There's nothing (unless the patents are revealed, and there's contention as to whether Microsoft and Apple have patented the same thing) to indicate this helps HTC or Google at all in regards to the Apple situation, or harms Apple at all: Microsoft patents are neither here nor there for Apple's purposes, and Apple's patents (as long as Microsoft neither licenses them or infringes on them) are neither here nor there for Microsoft's purposes.
This would be a much more meaningful story if the patents in question were explicitly listed, and it was revealed who is currently licensing them or thought to be infringing on them currently: that's not available, so there's nothing to see here in regards to Apple or Google that's clear cut or even an educated guess that makes any sense.