Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 28th Apr 2010 14:31 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 421358
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: This is Android Specific
by japh on Thu 29th Apr 2010 07:09
in reply to "This is Android Specific"
What I really can't understand, though, is why if nobody believes there are patents in Linux that MS owns, the Linux foundation (don't they own the Trademark on Linux) don't sue MS for libel and slander and defamation of character or whatever the business version of this is.
Because most people are probably pretty sure that Linux is in fact has parts that are covered by patents. Considering how broad patents are granted and how obvious things are being patented, I'd say that not infringing on any Microsoft patent would be really hard.
Even when those patents are not good, you probably don't want to take on one of the largest lawyer armies in the world to try to prove that.
It doesn't matter if you're right if you have to forfeit because you run out of money. I'm sure Microsoft would like nothing better than to bankrupt the Linux foundation while still not showing a list of all the patents Ballmer talked about.
RE: This is Android Specific
by niemau on Thu 29th Apr 2010 15:02
in reply to "This is Android Specific"
it is about making profit from Linux... just like the deal with Novell and the deal with Amazon.
no, it isn't. any profit is just icing on the cake. these actions are designed to deter businesses from choosing a linux-based platform over a MS platform and furthermore to drive an ideological wedge into the FOSS community.




Member since:
2005-10-13
I can't understand all the second guessing here... The announcement is perfectly clear. Microsoft will receive royalties for every Android handset sold. This has nothing to do with Apple or WM7, it is about making profit from Linux... just like the deal with Novell and the deal with Amazon.
What I really can't understand, though, is why if nobody believes there are patents in Linux that MS owns, the Linux foundation (don't they own the Trademark on Linux) don't sue MS for libel and slander and defamation of character or whatever the business version of this is.