Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 29th Apr 2010 16:59 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 421483
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-23
For what it's worth, Adobe was dragging its feet on switching to Carbon. The framework was there in Mac OS 8.x and they likely didn't investigate it at all.
When they finally released Photoshop 7, it was a minimal Carbon application and ran much better on Mac OS (8.x, 9.x) than Mac OS X. That was typical of an application where someone added "#include carbon.h" and the carbon libraries to the project and re-built the thing.
Adobe always seem to do the minimum.
As far as Steve Jobs being a hypocrite, isn't that typical of all leaders? I've seen videos of several people important to computing and they're all interested in doing what's best for their own group, not the rest of the world and they'll do whatever it takes to secure their own interests.