Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 29th Apr 2010 16:59 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 421583
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
...
-Does it follow general look of the operating system
-No
...
That's amusing to me because there is so much software on Windows that doesn't follow the look of the operating system. These days, office products are just about the only pieces of software that actually look as though they were designed for Windows.
Mind you, if you change the theme, iTunes is worse at acclimating to the changes of the operating system, but that could be fixed.




Member since:
2006-06-22
I couldn't care less about your experience with iTunes (nor his or hers), they do not provide ANY insight into the quality of an application. Every individual has a different experience.
My criteria is fairly simple:
-Does it follow general look of the operating system
-No
-Does it have a lot of dependencies (if yes are those acceptable)
-Yes, hell no
-Is there quality support for issues that surface
No, Apple has not fixed "fast user switching" issue.
-Does the software pretend to know more then I do, about what I really need and want (this is really bad)
Yes
There you go, very simple and to the point as to why iTunes IS a piece of junk.
And finally, take it from an engineer of telecommunications and information systems (me) who in his life wrote well above 50k lines of code, if you had a PhD in the relevant field your post would be entirely different :-)