Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 29th Apr 2010 16:59 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 421585
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
And the funny thing is that encouraging the use of H.264 has the unintended consequence of encouraging the continued use of Flash. Since Flash supports H.264, any site that uses H.264 files in HTML5 <video> tags will probably also offer the same video through Flash (since that's the easiest way to provide the same video to XP and Vista users).
If Apple truly wanted to "save" the web from the evils of Flash, then throwing support behind H.264 is self-defeating (at least in the short-term).