Linked by Kroc Camen on Thu 29th Apr 2010 23:04 UTC
Internet Explorer I am almost flabbergasted by the spin and blunt-face upon which this news is delivered. We were just discussing the pot calling the kettle black with Apple / Adobe and now Microsoft have also come out in favour of a closed video format for an open web--IE9's HTML5 video support will allow H264 only. Update Now that the initial shock is over, I've rewritten the article to actually represent news rather than something on Twitter.
Thread beginning with comment 421643
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Uhm
by phoenix on Thu 29th Apr 2010 23:38 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Uhm"
phoenix
Member since:
2005-07-11

With IE and Safari supporting only H.264 video, which covers the default browser of the two main OSes, why would anyone provide their content in non-H.264 content?

And if no-one provides their content in non-H.264 versions, how are non-IE/non-Safari users supposed to access it?

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[5]: Uhm
by segedunum on Thu 29th Apr 2010 23:51 in reply to "RE[4]: Uhm"
segedunum Member since:
2005-07-06

With IE and Safari supporting only H.264 video, which covers the default browser of the two main OSes, why would anyone provide their content in non-H.264 content?

Because Microsoft and Apple don't dictate the content I'm afraid. Sites on the web and popular sites like YouTube do and those sites have more of a vested interest in making sure their content is accessible everywhere without handcuffs on them. Apple, in particular, are going to find that out the hard way. If you're railing against a particular technology then you'd better make damn sure there are things people actually want to access in your alternate world. Microsoft and Apple don't have anything.

And if no-one provides their content in non-H.264 versions, how are non-IE/non-Safari users supposed to access it?

It's tough shit really if you want to access the sites and content that all the cool kids are looking at and have all the cool features. That's what happened in the early days of the web with Netscape, and IE simply had to follow. If they hadn't they would have failed. Ditto here. They're not in a position to dictate.

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[6]: Uhm
by fanboi_fanboi on Fri 30th Apr 2010 20:32 in reply to "RE[5]: Uhm"
fanboi_fanboi Member since:
2010-04-21

Apple, in particular, are going to find that out the hard way. If you're railing against a particular technology then you'd better make damn sure there are things people actually want to access in your alternate world.


Except that YouTube is already in beta on an HTML5/non-Flash version of their site ... so there goes that argument. http://www.youtube.com/html5

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[5]: Uhm
by daveak on Fri 30th Apr 2010 18:16 in reply to "RE[4]: Uhm"
daveak Member since:
2008-12-29

Safari does NOT just support H.264. Support is based off QuickTime and will support codecs that QuickTime supports.

Reply Parent Score: 1