To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Or maybe the EU can mandate that they support the 5 most popular formats for each and every video.
Unlikely, unless they can figure out a legal way of squeezing money out of it and into their pockets.
It's just so frustrating that in the US and anywhere else with software patents being valid this totally pisses on the whole idea of free web, not to mention pissing on the feet of OS enthusiasts, regular home-users with non-mainstream OS, volunteer run computer shops and classes and so on: for OS enthusiasts even if you were to acquire a H.264 decoder it'd most likely be illegal, for regular home-users it'd make them criminals without them even knowing it and they most likely don't know about Fluendo codecs (not to mention their willingness to pay for codecs!), volunteer run shops and classes are often running Linux and as such have to skip H.264 content completely or buy Fluendo codecs for all of their machines..
This is really sad, though I'm not surprised by this news however. It was quite easily expected.
I've read here multiple times that in Europe, monopoly itself is indeed illegal. That once a company reaches such dominance that it can dictate terms for what everyone else in the industry does (which is actually lower than the "monopoly" threshold), then that company must "help" its competitors to even things out.




Member since:
2006-07-04
If YouTube has that much power, that is, monopolistic power, then maybe they should be broken up. Or maybe the EU can mandate that they support the 5 most popular formats for each and every video. Yeah, I went there.