Linked by Kroc Camen on Thu 29th Apr 2010 23:04 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 421747
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-08-26
So all it requires is Google to re-encode their videos, probably with VP8.
It is estimated that Google has in excess of one million servers. Google could arguably be able to re-encode on million of its most popular videos within a few minutes, and another million within a few more minutes, and tens of millions of its most popular videos within an hour.
Where is the problem here?
Of course it is technically possible for them to do it, but they don't want to. They like H.264 and VP8 is just a useful distraction at the moment. SEE WE LIKE OPEN SOURCE.....now let's keep encoding those H.264 videos.
Not many? Google has millions, but Microsoft wouldn't have that many.
The point is that Microsoft has zero control over web video codecs which can be seen by the fact that they use Flash in many of their own websites.
Why exactly isn't Theora, or an opened VP8, the very least of three or four evils then?
Because MS already uses H.264 in Silverlight.