Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 30th Apr 2010 21:40 UTC, submitted by Helge
Legal Well, this certainly explains a whole lot. Both Apple and Microsoft have stated that the legality of Theora is highly debatable, and as it turns out, they knew more than we do - most likely courtesy of their close involvement with the MPEG-LA. Responding to an email from Free Software Foundation Europe activist Hugo Roy, Steve Jobs has stated that a patent pool is being assembled to go after Theora. Update: Monty Montgomery of Xiph (Ogg and Theora's parent organisation) has responded on Slashdot: "If Jobs's email is genuine, this is a powerful public gaffe ('All video codecs are covered by patents'). He'd be confirming MPEG's assertion in plain language anyone can understand. It would only strengthen the pushback against software patents and add to Apple's increasing PR mess. Macbooks and iPads may be pretty sweet, but creative individuals don't really like to give their business to jackbooted thugs."
Thread beginning with comment 421928
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Flash for Future?
by bhtooefr on Sat 1st May 2010 02:07 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Flash for Future?"
bhtooefr
Member since:
2009-02-19

The player interface is delivered in SWF format, yes.

The video is in a separate file, which is an FLV file.

http://bhtooefr.ath.cx/images/h264flv.png

Flash video, freshly grabbed from YouTube. H.264 codec.

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[4]: Flash for Future?
by segedunum on Sun 2nd May 2010 22:09 in reply to "RE[3]: Flash for Future?"
segedunum Member since:
2005-07-06

Flash has historically used Sorensen Spark and the On2 protocol like VP6 before adding h.264 itself, but nevertheless, what you receive at your end distributed over the internet is still Flash specific and you still need to re-encode if you target the web. Bulk transcoding is still very difficult so most of the video remains in the previous two codecs behind the scenes.

People seem to think they can claim this as popular h.264 support for web video. They can't.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[5]: Flash for Future?
by bhtooefr on Sun 2nd May 2010 22:14 in reply to "RE[4]: Flash for Future?"
bhtooefr Member since:
2009-02-19

It's not a re-encode, it's a container format change.

And, if you support what's in the container, you can support the container without too much additional work.

Reply Parent Score: 1