To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Since those patents are publicly listed, if you're going to create a video codec you'd better check before you invest.
Then you'd better stop coding any video coding related algorithm whatsoever. There are just so many alorithms and variations that form the basis of almost all codecs; above them the precious patent system let everyone&dog patent every damn small piece of crap they could come up with. In the end what you get is a damn high wall of stone around you.
The only solution is to come up with an idea that is so groundbeakingly new that nobody has ever tried to patent it - and you're f*cked, since creating, implementing, testing and transforming into an all-usable version a new video coding algorithm could take so many man-months of research and coding most people can't even imagine.
And then you'll need to proove you're as good or better than others, which will be followed by everyone else threatening with lawsuits, and so on and so forth.
Tyrione > Ever heard of submarine patents ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submarine_patent
Edited 2010-05-01 21:31 UTC





Member since:
2005-11-21
I think when it comes to patents, there should be some kind of law that, if you're going to threaten somebody with a patent lawsuit, then you must list the specific patent (or patents) that you feel are being violated. In other words, either shit or get off the pot. None of this 'you may be violating one or more of our patents' BS. "
Since those patents are publicly listed, if you're going to create a video codec you'd better check before you invest.