Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 30th Apr 2010 21:40 UTC, submitted by Helge
Legal Well, this certainly explains a whole lot. Both Apple and Microsoft have stated that the legality of Theora is highly debatable, and as it turns out, they knew more than we do - most likely courtesy of their close involvement with the MPEG-LA. Responding to an email from Free Software Foundation Europe activist Hugo Roy, Steve Jobs has stated that a patent pool is being assembled to go after Theora. Update: Monty Montgomery of Xiph (Ogg and Theora's parent organisation) has responded on Slashdot: "If Jobs's email is genuine, this is a powerful public gaffe ('All video codecs are covered by patents'). He'd be confirming MPEG's assertion in plain language anyone can understand. It would only strengthen the pushback against software patents and add to Apple's increasing PR mess. Macbooks and iPads may be pretty sweet, but creative individuals don't really like to give their business to jackbooted thugs."
Thread beginning with comment 421986
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Which patents?
by marcp on Sat 1st May 2010 12:32 UTC in reply to "RE: Which patents?"
marcp
Member since:
2007-11-23

I'd say there should be law that forces the accusators to pay huge amount of money to accused when the accusations happens to be false-based. Either this, or law suit from the accused part of this 'deal'.

Overally I agree with you.

Reply Parent Score: 1