Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 30th Apr 2010 21:40 UTC, submitted by Helge
Thread beginning with comment 422296
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Flash for Future?
by segedunum on Sun 2nd May 2010 22:41
in reply to "RE[5]: Flash for Future?"
It's not a re-encode, it's a container format change.
Support for a new codec has nothing to do with the container. Most web video for Flash is still Sorensen and VP6 behind the scenes, so yes, we are talking about a mass re-encode job if we're going to somehow claim that h.264 is widely used for web video currently.
Again, trying to somehow claim h.264 is widely used for web video because Flash video can now support it as an input is just plain wrong. I'm afraid you're talking nonsense. Moving to h.264 is a hell of a lot more than simply switching from Flash to HTML5 video as a container.
Edited 2010-05-02 22:44 UTC
RE[7]: Flash for Future?
by bhtooefr on Sun 2nd May 2010 22:43
in reply to "RE[6]: Flash for Future?"





Member since:
2009-02-19
It's not a re-encode, it's a container format change.
And, if you support what's in the container, you can support the container without too much additional work.